Supreme Court blocks total pardon for Junqueras, reaffirming legal boundaries

The Spanish Supreme Court has firmly rejected the request from the government, led by Pedro Sánchez, to convert the partial pardon granted to Oriol Junqueras into a total pardon. This decision ensures that Junqueras remains ineligible to run for office until July 2031, following his conviction related to the "procés" movement, which sought Catalan independence.

The court emphasized that the partial pardon, which lifted his prison sentence, should not extend to the 13-year disqualification also imposed on him. The ruling highlights the importance of maintaining judicial integrity and warns against using pardons as tools to undermine final judicial resolutions.

Junqueras, leader of the Esquerra Republicana de Catalunya (ERC), was convicted of sedition and embezzlement, resulting in significant legal consequences that have shaped his political trajectory. Notably, the Supreme Court's ruling applies similarly to former councilors Raül Romeva, Jordi Turull, and Dolors Bassa, reinforcing a unified judicial stance on these matters.

The court's disapproval of the government's intentions stems from a concern that allowing total pardons could set a dangerous precedent, potentially disrupting the established legal framework. The justices stated that such actions would effectively turn a partial measure into a total one, contradicting legislative intent.

In its judgment, the Supreme Court pointed to a lack of evidence indicating any remorse from Junqueras regarding his actions, further justifying its decision. The judges noted that, despite his activities since his release from prison, including participation in rallies and meetings with other Catalan independence leaders, there has been no indication of a willingness to reconcile with the legal order he once challenged.

The Supreme Court's ruling serves as a clear reminder of the limits of executive power in judicial matters. The court reiterated that the right of grace, which allows for pardons, cannot be utilized as a means to annul a firm conviction or as a substitute for judicial review.

This decision arrives amid ongoing discussions about the implications of the "procés" and its legacy within Spanish politics. As the political landscape continues to evolve, the Supreme Court's firm stance reinforces the judiciary's role in safeguarding the rule of law and maintaining the boundaries between government actions and judicial authority.