- 14:50Chemsedine Talbi completes Sunderland move after stellar Club Brugge season
- 14:20Police in Marrakech detain Algerian-French suspect wanted by Interpol
- 13:30EU unveils stockpiling plan to prepare for crises and conflict
- 12:50Spain eases lockdowns as firefighters stabilize Catalonia forest blaze
- 12:20Spaniards favor China over the US in shifting global perceptions
- 11:50Muzz redefines marriage conversations in Morocco with groundbreaking campaign
- 11:20Morocco and Brazil strengthen economic ties at Marrakech forum
- 10:50Morocco reopens embassy in Damascus, marking new chapter in bilateral ties
- 10:20Algeria fabricates US presidential message amid growing diplomatic strains
Follow us on Facebook
Rudy Giuliani Faces Courtroom Criticism for Outburst Over Assets Case
In a tense New York courtroom, Rudy Giuliani, the former mayor of New York City and once a presidential candidate, clashed with U.S. District Judge Lewis J. Liman during a pretrial hearing related to a defamation lawsuit. The hearing, which took place in Manhattan, centered around Giuliani’s failure to provide the title of a car as part of his efforts to comply with a $148 million defamation judgment.
Giuliani, who is accused of defaming two Georgia election workers in the aftermath of the 2020 presidential election, became visibly frustrated when Judge Liman questioned his lawyer about why the car’s title had not been submitted yet. The judge, recalling Giuliani’s former role as U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, expressed doubt that Giuliani was unable to secure a duplicate title for the vehicle, given his legal background.
In response, Giuliani leaned into the microphone and forcefully denied any negligence, claiming that he had applied for the duplicate title, but it had not yet arrived. He criticized the judge’s implication that he had been negligent, asserting, “The implication I’ve been not diligent about it is totally incorrect.” Giuliani further stated, “The implication you make is against me, and every implication against me is wrong.”
Giuliani went on to express his financial difficulties, telling the court, “I’m not impoverished. Everything I have is tied up.” He detailed how his assets, including a car and bank accounts, were restricted by various court orders, and he claimed that his Social Security account had been wrongly frozen.
Judge Liman, not tolerating the interruption, warned Giuliani’s legal team that further outbursts would not be allowed. “The next time Mr. Giuliani interrupts a hearing, he will not be permitted to speak,” the judge stated firmly. He emphasized that the court would take appropriate action if Giuliani continued to speak out of turn.
The outburst has drawn attention to the ongoing legal challenges faced by Giuliani, who has been embroiled in multiple lawsuits related to his actions following the 2020 election. His courtroom conduct and financial disclosures will likely remain a focal point in the coming months as the case progresses.