- 13:30EU unveils stockpiling plan to prepare for crises and conflict
- 12:50Spain eases lockdowns as firefighters stabilize Catalonia forest blaze
- 12:20Spaniards favor China over the US in shifting global perceptions
- 11:50Muzz redefines marriage conversations in Morocco with groundbreaking campaign
- 11:20Morocco and Brazil strengthen economic ties at Marrakech forum
- 10:50Morocco reopens embassy in Damascus, marking new chapter in bilateral ties
- 10:20Algeria fabricates US presidential message amid growing diplomatic strains
- 09:50Morocco embraces strategic carbon markets to lead low-carbon future
- 09:20Dutch mosque suspends imam after Jerusalem visit, meeting with Israeli president
Follow us on Facebook
The Legal Race: Will Trump Dodge the Last-Chance Trial?
Legal observers are holding their breath as the U.S. Supreme Court prepares to decide a burning question: Does former President Donald Trump enjoy criminal immunity for his alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election results? While most experts anticipate a decisive setback for the former real estate tycoon, the outcome may hinge on how quickly the nine justices render their verdict.
By agreeing to review this thorny case on February 28, the nation's highest court has once again delayed Trump's highly anticipated federal trial for his alleged efforts to illegally reverse the outcome of the election won by Joe Biden. With four separate criminal proceedings against him, the former president seems determined to delay his day in court, preferably until after the November elections.
However, the vast majority of legal experts agree that Trump stands alone in this legal battle. "I expect a majority decision, possibly even unanimous, against Trump," says Steven Schwinn, a constitutional law professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago. Even with three Trump-appointed justices on the conservative Court, a setback seems almost certain.
Yet even in the face of a resounding defeat, federal prosecutors could find themselves in a race against time to conduct a trial before the presidential election. "There's a window, but it's narrow and closing quickly," warns Randall Eliason, a former federal prosecutor now teaching criminal law. "The justices need to act swiftly; otherwise, there's a chance the trial might start in the fall."
In this unprecedented case, where the democratic stakes are high, the Supreme Court is obliged to issue a prompt ruling. A prolonged delay could allow Trump to once again evade facing the charges, missing a key opportunity for accountability amid one of the most significant constitutional crises in recent American history.