- 17:00Israel vows to strike Iran again if threatened, defense minister warns
- 16:20Morocco sees record 8.9 million tourists in first half of 2025
- 15:50Morocco aims to secure five-month wheat stock amid price drop
- 15:20Macron and Starmer to sign historic nuclear deterrence pact
- 14:50Chemsedine Talbi completes Sunderland move after stellar Club Brugge season
- 14:20Police in Marrakech detain Algerian-French suspect wanted by Interpol
- 13:30EU unveils stockpiling plan to prepare for crises and conflict
- 12:50Spain eases lockdowns as firefighters stabilize Catalonia forest blaze
- 12:20Spaniards favor China over the US in shifting global perceptions
Follow us on Facebook
USA-BRICS Trump's Proposal to Safeguard the Dollar's Dominance
The President-elect of the United States, Donald Trump, has issued a stark warning to BRICS countries, threatening to impose 100% tariffs if they opt to move away from the US dollar in international trade. Trump emphasized that these nations must not establish a new BRICS currency or support alternatives to the "powerful American dollar." Failure to comply, he stated, would result in the imposition of severe tariffs and a significant decline in access to the US market.
The BRICS countries—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—have been exploring alternatives to the dollar as the global reserve currency. Discussions have included the creation of a common currency to facilitate trade and reduce dependence on the US financial system. This move challenges the longstanding dominance of the dollar in global trade and finance.
Earlier this week, Trump extended his trade threats to Mexico and Canada. He warned of imposing a 25% tariff on all imports if these neighboring countries fail to enhance border security to combat illegal immigration and drug trafficking.
As Trump prepares to take office on January 20, these bold declarations signal his administration's intention to pursue aggressive economic policies aimed at preserving the United States' economic and financial influence globally. However, they also raise questions about the potential impact on international trade relations and the broader global economy.