- 17:00Elon Musk plans AI-powered revival of Vine, sparking mixed reactions
- 16:20Spain’s PM gains momentum as corruption scandal hits opposition party
- 15:50Spain’s workforce grows by over 1 million foreigners in a decade
- 15:20Exploring legal alternatives to Spain's Beckham Law tax regime
- 14:50Flight attendant sentenced to 18 years for secretly filming minors in airplane bathrooms
- 14:20Morocco signs $3.7 billion deal to modernize airports and strengthen aviation sector
- 13:30Gaza starvation crisis deepens as death toll reaches 114 and malnutrition soars
- 12:50Wrestling legend Hulk Hogan dies at 71, leaving a lasting legacy
- 12:20U.S. fertility rate hits record low despite rise in total births
Follow us on Facebook
Macron’s recognition of Palestine divides political spectrum in France
French President Emmanuel Macron announced plans to officially recognize the State of Palestine during the upcoming United Nations General Assembly in September, sparking sharp divisions among France’s political leaders. While the left hailed it as a necessary and overdue step, the right and far-right criticized it as reckless and dangerous.
A historic pledge for peace
In a statement shared on social media, Macron asserted that France, committed to a “just and lasting peace in the Middle East,” will acknowledge Palestine as a state. This aligns with efforts to revive the two-state solution amid escalating tensions between Israel and Palestine. France and Saudi Arabia will co-chair an international summit later this year to rekindle peace talks.
The upcoming announcement follows the postponement of a planned June conference due to the Israeli-Iranian conflict and coincides with renewed hostilities in Gaza. A ministerial meeting is scheduled for late July in New York as a precursor to the broader diplomatic initiative.
Criticism from the right
Conservative and far-right leaders have condemned Macron’s decision, arguing it legitimizes the militant group Hamas. François-Xavier Bellamy of Les Républicains described the move as “useless and counterproductive,” claiming it endangers both Israeli and Palestinian civilians. Marine Le Pen, leader of the far-right Rassemblement National, went further, labeling the recognition an endorsement of “a terrorist state,” asserting it undermines France’s historical values.
Similarly, Jordan Bardella, president of Rassemblement National, and Eric Ciotti of the Union of the Right for the Republic, criticized the decision as hasty, politically motivated, and disrespectful to victims of recent violence.
Left-wing support and calls for urgency
Left-wing politicians, including Jean-Luc Mélenchon of La France Insoumise, welcomed the announcement as a “moral victory” but pushed for immediate action. Mélenchon called for an arms embargo and stronger measures against what he described as a “genocide” in Gaza. Marine Tondelier of the Ecologists echoed this sentiment, urging swift implementation to aid civilians.
Olivier Faure, leader of the Socialist Party, expressed support but emphasized the need for sanctions against Israel’s government to address ongoing humanitarian crises.
Macron’s government defends the move
The Macron administration dismissed accusations of legitimizing Hamas, emphasizing that recognizing Palestine strengthens the two-state solution. Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot argued the decision counters Hamas’ rejection of peace. Other officials, including Education Minister Elisabeth Borne, stressed that the two-state framework remains the only viable path to lasting peace and security in the region.
Prominent figures within Macron’s camp, such as Marc Fesneau of MoDem and former Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin, praised the announcement as “historic” and urged France to lead humanitarian efforts in Gaza, including the delivery of essential supplies.
A step toward resolving a complex conflict
Macron’s recognition of Palestine signals a bold step in addressing decades of deadlock in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. While celebrated by some as a long-overdue commitment to peace, others see it as a perilous gamble with far-reaching consequences.