Meta Reverses Policy, Halting Fact-Checking Program and Easing Content Restrictions

Meta Platforms, a leading social media company, has made a significant shift in its approach to content management. In a major policy reversal, Meta has discontinued its U.S. fact-checking program and reduced restrictions on debates about sensitive topics like immigration and gender identity. This decision follows mounting pressure from conservative critics as Donald Trump prepares to take office for a second term.

The change, the most notable adjustment in Meta’s political content management in recent years, reflects CEO Mark Zuckerberg's intention to improve relations with the incoming administration. This alteration will impact some of the largest global platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, and Threads, with more than 3 billion active users worldwide.

Recently, Meta appointed Joel Kaplan, a Republican policy expert, to the role of global affairs head and elected Dana White, CEO of the Ultimate Fighting Championship and a close Trump ally, to its board. In a video message, Zuckerberg shared that the company had reached a point where mistakes and censorship had become too frequent, emphasizing a return to "free expression" as a priority.

In response to the changes, Trump expressed approval, acknowledging Zuckerberg's efforts. When questioned about whether these changes were influenced by his own threats against Zuckerberg, Trump implied they were, stating "probably."

Instead of a formal fact-checking program, Zuckerberg announced that Meta would adopt a "community notes" system, which is similar to the one used by the social media platform X, owned by Elon Musk. Additionally, Meta will scale back its proactive search for hate speech and other rule violations, now only addressing flagged content through user reports. Automated systems will focus on removing serious violations, such as terrorism, child exploitation, scams, and drug-related content.

Meta will also relocate its content policy teams from California to other U.S. states, including Texas. This restructuring has been in the works for over a year, though it has caused confusion among employees who have shared their concerns anonymously.

The abrupt cancellation of the fact-checking program, which had been in place since 2016, took its partner organizations by surprise. Several fact-checking groups, including AFP and the International Fact-Checking Network, expressed disappointment. They defended their work, asserting that fact-checking journalism does not censor but adds context and debunks false claims.

While Meta's shift may appeal to conservative audiences, critics argue that it weakens content moderation during a time when misinformation is spreading faster than ever. Some experts, like Ross Burley of the Centre for Information Resilience, believe this change is politically motivated rather than a smart policy decision.

Currently, Meta's policy changes apply only to the U.S., with no immediate plans to adjust its approach in the European Union, which has stricter regulations for tech companies. Following the announcement, the European Commission has taken note, especially as Musk’s X is already under investigation in the region over its own community notes system.