- 17:00Samsung showcases cutting-edge gaming tech at Morocco Gaming Expo 2025
- 16:20Dozens killed at Gaza aid site as children die of malnutrition amid blockade
- 15:50Colombian authorities arrest alleged leader of Italian mafia’s Latin American operations
- 15:36A first in Morocco: E-commerce platforms now accept QR-code mobile payments
- 15:20Russia launches massive aerial assault on Ukraine, kills two in Chernivtsi
- 14:50Putin backs 'zero enrichment' nuclear deal for Iran, urges cooperation with US
- 14:35Nigeria-Morocco gas pipeline: steering committees review progress in Rabat
- 14:20Iran announces shift in cooperation with UN nuclear watchdog
- 13:55High hotel prices push Moroccan expats to vacation in Spain and Portugal
Follow us on Facebook
UK Supreme Court to decide on legal definition of a woman
The UK is anticipating a significant ruling from its Supreme Court that could affect the rights of transgender individuals to access gender-specific services. The Court will decide whether the term "woman" in the Equality Act 2010 includes transgender women with gender recognition certificates (GRC).
The case arises from a challenge by the campaign group For Women Scotland (FWS) against the Scottish government. FWS contests a ruling that allowed transgender women with a GRC to occupy women-only positions on public boards, arguing that the legal definition of a woman should be limited to those born biologically female.
Transgender rights advocates, including the Scottish government and legal experts, defend the decision. They argue that the Gender Recognition Act of 2004 affirms that a GRC changes an individual's legal sex for all purposes, ensuring transgender women have the same legal protections as those born female.
The Supreme Court’s decision could lead to calls for changes to the Equality Act, potentially redefining the legal rights of transgender women and their access to women’s spaces and services. If the court sides with FWS, pressure will mount on the UK government to revise the law, which could affect policies on public board positions and women-only services.
The case has sparked controversy, especially as trans women were excluded from participating in the hearings, while civil rights organizations, such as Amnesty UK, were permitted to support the Scottish government's stance. Critics argue this exclusion disregards the affected group, highlighting concerns over equal rights for trans people in various legal contexts.